Thursday, September 19, 2013

Merchant of 'Vanish'

PC Sorcar Jr’s incredible magic tricks - collectively labelled Indrajaal - aren’t mere abracadabra. A deep undercurrent of philosophy props up his shows. The master illusionist spoke to KS Narayanan during a month-long performance tour of Delhi. Photos by Mukunda De

Master illusionist and India's greatest living magician Pradip Chandra Sorcar Jr and his daughter, Maneka, were in the National Capital for an entire month in May for a series of sold out shows staged to celebrate a hundred years of ‘Indrajaal’, the ‘web of magic’ that was initiated by his father, the legendary Praful Chandra Sorcar.

Every single day during the course of the month, the father and daughter duo carried on the family tradition and performed enthralling tricks, such as the famed “Water of India”, that were once an integral part of his father’s repertoire. A running gag during his show, it involves Sorcar Jr  pouring water out of a jug that never empties. In Delhi, the US-educated Maneka, the ninth-generation magician in the family, also successfully tried her hand at the illusion.

As scams tumbled out of the government's cupboard and the scorching heat made life rather difficult for residents of the Capital, the air-conditioned FICCI auditorium, packed with schools children, young magic enthusiasts and the elderly, provided relief as the master  and his daughter performed incredible, eye-popping sleights of hand.

The popularity of the Sorcars can be gauged from the fact that this tour went on for an entire month and even at the end of it, there was no let-up in enthusiasm. Every evening the auditorium buzzed with excitement.
Of course, the Sorcars’ vanishing tricks at their Delhi shows were not as edgy and spectacular as they are usually known to be, but they were impressive nonetheless. They are perhaps most celebrated for their vanishing routines. In the past, Sorcar Jr has made the Taj Mahal in Agra and the Victoria Memorial in Kolkata “disappear”.

He has also cycled blindfolded through rush-hour traffic in London, Munich, Madrid and Tokyo and has escaped from a sealed iron chest in less than a minute after a helicopter dropped it into the China Sea. He can walk on fire and water and turn a beautiful woman into a deadly python in the blink of an eye. Andf those are only a few of the unbelievable things he can pull off.

But many admirers claim that his most astounding act was making a train full of passengers vanish before the eyes of hundreds of witnesses at the Burdwan railway station in West Bengal on 12 July 1992. Sorcar Jr repeated that act with the Indore-Amritsar Express in November 2000.

How did he do it? “I have only one standard answer to that question, after which I add, ‘Don’t tell anyone,’” he laughs, explaining that the entire universe is actually magic. Night becomes day and day becomes night - isn't that magical?.

Pretty much as he does when he performs magic tricks on the stage, Sorcar Jr has a way with words. In an interview to this writer, the master illusionist explained that magic teaches many lessons to all of us. "Magic is the way to realise the truth and it helps people realise not to be prejudiced. It tells us not to believe what we see but explore the logic behind things. So I would say don’t believe what the minister said. But try to get behind the truth of his words," he said, opening the free-wheeling conversation.

Ask the master magician about ‘wizardy’, and one gets to dwell on the depth of science and technology. He says: “Magic is a forerunner to science. What is magic today is science tomorrow. In simple terms, unexplained science is magic. The moment it is explained it becomes pure science.” He goes on to give the example of key inventions that have changed human life in crucial ways like fire, machines, aeroplanes…

Sorcar Jr also says that magic adds philosophical and cultural subtexts to the tricks that he performs. For instance, the Water of India, an urn, is repeatedly tipped over and the water keeps flowing. On this Sorcar Special, the magician refers to the much-quoted verse from Isha Upanishad: Om Puurnnam-Adah Puurnnam-Idam Puurnnaat-Purnnam-Udacyate Puurnnashya Puurnnam-Aadaaya Puurnnam-Eva-Avashissyate/Om Shaantih Shaantih Shaantih. (Though there are many commentaries for the verse, one of them is, ”When this Whole is ‘taken out’ of that Whole, the Whole remains”).

On his plans to build Jaadu Nagri, a whole township and university of magic, Sorcar says it is still under process. Though the magician wanted to build Jaadu Nagri in scenic Darjeeling, the plan fell through due to the political conflict in the hills. Sorcar has now shifted it to Tripura.

“There is a hill there that I want to buy with my own money, money that I have earned from my magic shows. I don’t want the support of the government or of any private player; I don’t want any directives or restrictions. If I stop performing, how will I get the funds that I require in order to realise my dream,” he says, adding that a lot more needs to be done before the township can come up.

Without setting any time-frame for his dream project, Sorcar Jr remarks that his motto is simple and time-honoured: do not to ask what the country has done for you, but what you can  contribute to make it a better place.

Surrounded by four women who are performers in their own right - his wife Jayshree, a Bharatnatyam dancer and magician; and his three daughters, - Maneka, Mumtaz and Moubani, with his elder daughter Maneka becoming the first woman to break the bastion of magic held by men.

Though happy at the successful entry of Maneka into the sphere of magicians, Sorcar Jr points to the competition that he faces from her. “See, after my father’s death, he was my competitor. Now my daughter is my competitor. People keep comparing the two of us. Kids go to Manenka first to get her autograph and then they say, 'Uncle, we are coming to you' too. He adds: “That makes me happy and sad. Maneka is doing well. But then there is also competition.”

So he stresses that it is not just the tricks that he inherited from his father that are important. Equally important is every single ‘performance’. Otherwise, the audience will lose interest and move on, he warns.

Like Maneka, his other two daughters, Mumtaz and Moubani, are also creating magic on celluloid as they appear in lead role in Bangla movies.

However, the master points out that a magician does not mesmerise his audience. “There is a better word in Hinduism - sammohan, enchantment.

As much as the audience enjoys his magic tricks, Sorcar too finds innumerable magicians in his audience. “I enjoy the audience more than they enjoy my magic. All of them enjoy one PC Sorcar. I enjoy so many of them,” he says with a hearty laugh.

An applied psychologist by training, Sorcar explains that the audience is of two kinds - enlightened and innocent. The latter come and touch my feet. “I don’t like it at all.”

Among the enlightened, the master magician says, there are those that are looking for trick, art, magic and science. “I perform for children of all age groups,” he says, adding that a third category of audience is like 'tube lights' as they take time to react to the magic.

There have been times when Sorcar Jr has felt sorry for himself when people take magic for reality. He narrates how when he visited a grieving neighbour who lost his son and expected Sorcar to bring the deceased back to life. “When I explained to him that it was impossible, he abused me. However, he later apologised to me.” This is tragic magic.

Besides looking for inspiration from his father, Sorcar Sr, the magician also explores the tradition of magic like Banmati of South India, Mayong in Assam and ascetics back home in Bengal.


Source : IIPM Editorial, 2013.
An Initiative of IIPM, Malay Chaudhuri
For More IIPM Info, Visit below mentioned IIPM articles
ExecutiveMBA

Thursday, September 12, 2013

Do film festivals help make small films make it big?

Let’s face it. Film Festivals – local or global – have a certain snooty, intellectual, arty-farty, culture-driven aura about them. An image that screams superior, exclusive, unique! The message they seem to convey is, ‘We have nothing to do with the everyday mindless masala that you consume with such unsophisticated ganwar-glee because we are classy and niche, celebrating quality and not dumb-cluck 100-crore popularity! We remain committed to acknowledge and reward cinema that is original, fresh and edgy. Sure we are open to mainstream movies, but only if they push the envelope and infuse their material – beyond the stereotypical clichés – with surprise and delight that conforms to our template.’

This unspoken message emerging from the various Film Festivals across the world gives them a special place in the hearts and minds of the true-blue cognoscenti and offers distinct hope of life beyond the Khans!  It provides an exciting platform for filmmakers with original vision, themes and treatment to showcase their gems to evolved, cinema-literate and sophisticated audiences. These festivals (Cannes, Berlin, Venice, Toronto and London) give big or global recognition, praise and prizes, along with huge media coverage that come with the territory, thus frequently transforming an unknown filmmaker to an overnight celebrity. Hence, everything considered, Film Festivals are both, useful and necessary because they salute quality cinema; cinema with soul that reaches out and touches a universal chord, irrespective of geographical boundaries, linguistic barriers or star-power.  Cinema that celebrates truth at 24 frames per second.

Wonderful, inspirational, food for thought etc say some before offering a kill-joy query:  Do these Film Festivals, incidentally, help in pushing the commercial aspect of these great, sublime, hymned and celebrated masterpieces?  For example, in the just concluded  Cannes 2013, small-time, non-formulaic movies like Ugly, Dabba, Monsoon Shootout and Bombay Talkies were screened. Of course outside the competing films because no Indian film has been found worthy of competing in the last two decades, but that’s another story! So will it help their box office status at home in India?  In other words, does the stamp of a Cannes, Berlin, Venice or Toronto generate more excitement and curiosity for our audiences at home?

 Sociologically, it’s a fascinating issue. On the one hand, appreciation or certification from the firangs remain a cherished achievement in a land where Fair & Lovely rules!  However, when it comes to movies, funnily, it doesn’t wash one bit. The howling mobs don’t give a damn about what the global media said or what prestigious awards they picked up. It has to do with what they think and feel. Veteran filmmaker Shyam Benegal – who knows this syndrome inside out – offers his informed take on this subject. “Let’s get some facts straight. Film Festivals, across the world, are mandated to recognise, promote, publicise, celebrate and award ‘excellence in cinema’, irrespective of star, budget or country compulsions. The bottom line is simple. If the movie has a compelling narrative that excites and provokes in equal measure, that’s enough! In this scheme of things, commercial viability and box office potential don’t really feature, which is why respect and prestige are terms more commonly seen, read and heard at these events than preoccupation with the cash counter. Which is also why, while these films will receive critical acclaim and great reviews, they are unlikely to cause any great BO revolution!’’  Benegal is spot-on. Any number of our National Award Winners, then and now, have done the Festival circuit with great success, but tragically found zero resonance at home!  So, while Anurag Kashyap, Dibakar Banerjee, Zoya Akhtar and Karan Johar along with their films and gang of little known stars had a well-deserved blast at Cannes, duly reported in breathless fashion by an infatuated Indian media to a hungry desi audience, how these films will translate at home remains to be seen. While cynicism or skepticism should indeed not enter this debate, it is also important to be realistic, grounded and not necessarily believe that Nawaz Siddiqui and Irfaan Khan or Anurag Kashyap and Dibakar Banerjee are all set to take World Cinema by storm!

Avid Cinema buff Avinash Behl brings in his spin. Articulates the 40-year-old Delhi-based movie junkie. “These are two separate planets so please don’t connect them.  Historically – with some rare, freaky exceptions – films that rock with the Festival juries and critics rarely do the same with mass audiences and not all the publicity of their rave western/international acclaim can ever influence theatre footfalls. If it was so, wouldn’t our art-house filmmakers, so popular with the Fest circuit, be box-office baadshahs?  Most of these poor bozos, despite the prestige, honour and respect abroad, continue to rot at home, begging for funds to do their next film! The sensibilities are different, especially in a star-struck-Bollywood-crazed and glamour-hungry constituency like ours where the culturally underprivileged rule and the Khans are monarchs of all they survey.  Sure it is better than earlier times, but compared to the rest of the world, we are way behind. Our problem is we are too self-congratulatory and get carried away too easily. The 100 years of Cinema tamasha, too, is a joke because in the world stage we have achieved practically nothing! Even today in year 2013, Cannes went back to the master, Satyajit Ray and his iconic Charulata that was made five decades ago.”


Source : IIPM Editorial, 2013.
An Initiative of IIPM, Malay Chaudhuri
For More IIPM Info, Visit below mentioned IIPM articles
ExecutiveMBA

Saturday, September 07, 2013

On a sick bed

Measures to revive manufacturing are urgently needed

India is lucky to have two able technocrats at the helm of its economic affairs: Prime Minister Manmohan Singh is an Oxford alumnus while Finance Minister P.Chidambaram is a graduate from Harvard. Yet despite their helmsmanship, the economic horizons of the country have remained cloudy for some time now. That is in sharp contrast to the economic recovery being staged in the United States and China's steadfast growth, even though it has moderated of late. India's economic signals, on the other hand, have reasons to raise eyebrows: the latest figures from the Central Statistics Office (CSO) reveal that industrial growth has “slowed to a 20-year-low of 1 per cent in 2012-13” compared to 2.9 per cent in 2011-12. Clearly, the country is paying a heavy price for its overdependence on the service sector and showing neglect to the infrastructure and manufacturing sectors.

India’s premier rating agency Crisil says that the current situation is reminiscent of the crisis year of 1991-92 when industrial output grew by a mere 0.6 per cent whereas manufacturing output contracted by 0.8 per cent.  In addition, high input costs of raw materials and the crimping shortage of power supply seem to have further aggravated the problem. But what stands out starkly and clearly is that the government's apathy towards the infrastructure and manufacturing sectors is the reason for this gloomy scenario. Thankfully, the government seems to have now shaken off its stupor and woken to the reality that the service sector alone cannot be counted on to generate growth and employment.

FICCI President Naina Lal Kidwai said recently that "supply-side bottlenecks due to inadequate infrastructure, inadequacy of fuel supply linkages and delays in project clearances of large manufacturing and infrastructure projects should be the priority areas to be addressed through policy.” The government would do well to pay heed to such advice.


Source : IIPM Editorial, 2013.
An Initiative of IIPM, Malay Chaudhuri
For More IIPM Info, Visit below mentioned IIPM articles
IIPM’s Management Consulting Arm-Planman Consulting
Professor Arindam Chaudhuri – A Man For The Society….
IIPM: Indian Institute of Planning and Management
IIPM makes business education truly global
Management Guru Arindam Chaudhuri
Rajita Chaudhuri-The New Age Woman

ExecutiveMBA

Wednesday, August 28, 2013

Book Review: Land of The Seven Rivers

Geography as history

History can be very dangerous because our interpretations are invariably coloured by our ideological worldview. So let me state right at the outset that the JNU school of historians are not going to like this book. The Land of the Seven Rivers: A Brief History of India’s Geography by Sanjeev Sanyal is an audacious attempt that tries to bust many beliefs held strongly in traditional (read Marxist) interpretations of Indian history. For example, the author tries to argue that the Aryans were not invaders but people who originated in India and that the ancient Rig Veda is coterminous with the Harappan civilization. Believe me, hackles will be raised at this!

In any case, I have failed to understand the animosity and hostility between the JNU school of history and the, for want of a better term, the ‘Internet Hindu’ school of history. At their worst, both reveal closed minds and prejudices winning over curiosity. Frankly, I tend to laugh when exponents of Hindutva fashion Indian history though their blinkered eyes, invoking a great culture and civilization of yore when much of the world was hunting and gathering. I think that is taking jingoism a bit too far. For that matter, I also laugh when the more committed members of the JNU tribe dismiss everything to do with Hinduism or Indian civilization as hogwash. I think that is carrying Marxism a bit too far. The truth, as always, must surely lie somewhere in between these extreme positions. I had always thought that keeping an open mind should be the most important qualification for a social scientist! I mean, if theories held sacred even in pure sciences can be found to be untrue by subsequent flashes of genius and discoveries, why can’t the same be true of social sciences?

Take the case of economics. Till 1929, classical economics had unwavering faith in the ability of markets to produce the best possible outcomes. Advocates of this school of passionately believed that free markets lead to fill employment. Then came the Great Crash of 1929 and the subsequent depression when Capitalism faced a crisis of survival. John Maynard Keynes upended the whole structure of classical economics by arguing that markets can fail and government intervention is necessary when economies stagnate. The Keynes school of thought held away till the Reagan and Thatcher revolution of the 1980s when the markets and the pursuit of self interest once again became the reigning deities. Greed is Good became the new mantra till 2008 when Capitalism once again imploded and free market prophets were once again exposed as charlatans.

Surely something similar must happen with interpretations of Indian history? What Sanyal argues in his book about the amazing continuity of the Indian civilization is something that is accepted even by the less strident votaries of the JNU school. Of course, only the ideological hard balls would suggest that India even in ancient times was a political entity in terms of geographical boundaries and systems of governance. Like now, India then too was probably a cacophony of ideas, languages, ethnic backgrounds and a sense of belonging. And continuity is something which we cannot ignore. For example, Sanyal points out how the ox or the bullock cart has been continually visible in India right from the Harappan times to the 21st century. He also points out how the Gayatri Mantra could well be something many Indians have been chanting unchanged for about 4000 years or so. He spends considerable time trying to make sense of the still prevalent myth about the mighty river Saraswati. Sanyal tentatively concludes his quest for Saraswati by arguing that the nondescript river Ghaggar that runs through Haryana was once the mighty Saraswati till geography changed its destiny, and that of the Indian civilization. Not convinced? Even I am not and would wait for more credible evidence.

But I would definitely keep an open mind. Just as I keep doing even after reading Sanyal’s interpretation of the interaction between Islam and India. I refuse to buy the VHP theory that India and Islam mean a saga of conquests, destruction of temples and humiliation. I also refuse to buy the hard line JNU theory that Islam and India are all about trade and Sufism. I think both happened and it will help if both the extreme Left and extreme Right surrender their positions of denial. So if you are not ideologically blinkered and are curious about ‘The Wonder That is India!’, this book will surely give you some food for thought.


Source : IIPM Editorial, 2013.
An Initiative of IIPM, Malay Chaudhuri
For More IIPM Info, Visit below mentioned IIPM articles
IIPM’s Management Consulting Arm-Planman Consulting
Professor Arindam Chaudhuri – A Man For The Society….
IIPM: Indian Institute of Planning and Management
IIPM makes business education truly global
Management Guru Arindam Chaudhuri
Rajita Chaudhuri-The New Age Woman

ExecutiveMBA

Monday, July 29, 2013

Minority appeasement, again?

The SP government’s decision to withdraw terror charges triggers off a storm in the state, writes Puja Awasthi
The steely hope in Ayesha Qazmi’s voice pierces through a patchy telephone connection. “My burdens will go. It is now just a matter of days”, she exults from her home in the village of Sammopur, Azamgarh in Uttar Pradesh. A more restrained hope surges through the voice of Ghulam Qadir who speaks from Kushar village (Kisthwar, Jammu and Kashmir). “The worst is over. Life will begin to move again”, he says.

Ayesha and Qadir have not met but are linked to each other through the fates of two men. In the former’s case, that man is her husband Tariq Qazmi, a doctor of Unani medicine who is prime accused in the 2007 serial blasts of Gorakhpur which left six injured. For Qadir, it is his son Sajjad-ur-Rehman, who was arrested for being an accomplice in the blasts on a confessional statement by Tariq Qazmi and his alleged co-conspirator Khalid Mujahid, a teacher.

With the UP government’s recent announcement of a recommendation to drop charges against Tariq Qazmi, Sajjad-ur-Rehman’s release has become a logical expectation for he was supposedly implicated by the former. However, the logic of the grey war against terror has seldom been that simple. As Rajeev Yadav, spokesperson of the Rihai Manch, a forum campaigning for the release of innocent youths framed on terror charges, explains: “The announcement is just a ploy to distract the community. The government is playing with emotions. The court is free to dismiss the government’s recommendation even if district officials endorse it. Terrorism is a political issue”.

Even if the court were to accept the government’s appeal, Tariq Qazmi would continue to remain in jail as he is also accused in the court blasts of November 23, 2007 which left 14 dead. The case is currently being tried in Barabanki and given the might of the state’s lawyers it is doubtful that the government will risk a similar announcement in it. That more important sub text has been lost in the cacophony that has followed the government’s announcement.

The government has also announced the dropping of treason charges (brought because they shouted anti-India slogans in a Lucknow court) against five accused from West Bengal – Mohamed Ali Akbar, Mukhtar Hussain, Azizur Rehman, Nasimul Hafiz and Nurul Isman. Once again, the more important fact of them still remaining in jail under the Explosives Act was lost in the criticism that the government was playing with fire. The Samajwadi Party had promised to release all innocents falsely jailed on terror charges in its election manifesto. According to a list compiled by the Rihai Manch, 25 such accused from the state are jailed in the state, 20 have been jailed outside the state while 10 accused from other states are in UP’s prisons.

Last November, the government made its first announcement (not recommendation) in the Rampur CRPF camp attack case and was promptly challenged through a petition filed in the Allahabad High Court. Since the government never actually filed an application, the petition was dismissed. This time a member of the Samajwadi Party is threatening to approach the court in Faizabad even though the government’s stand will become clear only on May 3, the next date for the hearing in the case against Tariq Qazmi.

Yet, a storm of protests is rising. The state BJP unit’s spokesperson Vinay Bahadur Pathak says, “There will be dangerous consequences of this politics of appeasement. If the government has to decide everything, why have courts?” Manish Mahajan, the state president of the Akhil Bharat Hindu Mahasabha says, “By rewarding terrorists, the government is stooping low to ensure its hold on the minority vote”.

Within the state’s Anti Terrorist Squad (ATS) there are other worries. “All the hard work that went into building a case against the terrorists will be lost to political caprice. This will discourage the force and send out a wrong message”, says a high-ranking official.

Tariq Qazmi and Khalid Mujahid were arrested (according to the police version) from the Barabanki railway station with 1.250 kg RDX, six detonators, three cellphones and two SIM cards, a month after the Gorakhpur blast. On their confession, a few days later, Sajjad-ur-Rahman and Akhtar, both from Jammu and Kashmir, were also arrested.

In September of the following year, the Mumbai police made five arrests and declared that it had netted the group responsible for all blasts in the country since 2005, including Gorakhpur, thus punching holes in the claims of the state police.

In 2012, a report submitted to the state government by the one man Nimesh Commission (appointed by the previous Mayawati government in 2008) concluded that the police version of events on December 22, 2007 (the day of Tariq Qazmi and Khalid Mujahid’s arrest) was “suspicious” and suggested action against all those officials and personnel who played an “active role” in the arrests of the two, without actually naming anyone.

In a curious twist, the Samajwadi Party government has denied the existence of the report. As recently as March this year, the state’s home department, responding to a RTI query asking for a copy of the report said that it had never received it, hence the question of sharing it did not arise. Seven weeks later, the state’s home secretary cited the same report while announcing the proposal for Tariq Qazmi’s release.

The perils of this ambiguity are obvious to Zaheer Alam Falahi, uncle of Khalid Mujahid. “While it is good that the government is working on its promise, till it does not officially release the report, the perception that the recommendations were not backed by impartial investigations will grow. This will harm both the party and the community”, he says.

SR Darapuri, the state’s former Inspector General of Police, says that there are larger questions that must be answered. “The blasts were a fact, as were the arrests. The government must investigate who was responsible for both. Were the real culprits let off? Where did the explosives that the police claimed to have recovered from the accused come from?”


Source : IIPM Editorial, 2013.
An Initiative of IIPM, Malay Chaudhuri
For More IIPM Info, Visit below mentioned IIPM articles




Thursday, June 27, 2013

Throw open the doors

The UN needs to make its job selection process transparent

Alluding to the United Nations’opaque selection process for candidates to its key bodies, Sir Richard Dolly, ex Director of UNICEF, makes a candid admission: “There is a need for some process of open hearing and interview of the best qualified potential candidates.”  The issue of selection cropped up when the U.N. Conference on Trade and Development announced the recruitment for the coveted post of secretary general. As per the UN’s cyclical selection process, the next man for the secretary general position to the UNCTAD must be from Africa. But, as is often the case, there is already a long queue in the run-up to the announcement of selection in September this year. Even curiouser, the UN Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon, who has the power to select, has refused to divulge the details of the shortlisted candidates.

The UN has a particularly blemished record when it comes to the selection of candidates for its various arms and agencies. The IMF and the World Bank too have a similar dismal record of recruitment, which they try to defend under the garb of “gentlemen’s agreement.” According to the agreement, the head of the IMF and the World Bank must either be an American or a European. That's a brazen display of economic and racial apartheid. Despite wide-ranging agreement among its members to drop the discriminatory policy, these bodies have not budged and obnoxious policy has endured to this day. What's even more exacerbating is that the rules of selection at these two apex bodies remain a closed-door exercise, with no information shared beyond their cloistered foyers.

 It seems that in the matter of selection of candidates for UNCTAD, Ban Ki-Moon is drawing his strategy from history, even though there is a need for adopting a new tack. According to Sir Dolly, eminent experts in the field like the Nobel laureate Joseph Eugene Stiglitz, an American economist and professor at Columbia University, and Jose Antonio Ocampo, former Under-Secretary-General of UN, ought to be in Moon’s selection panel. Though Moon ought to pay heed to what these respectable voices have been urging him to do, he has the luxury of acting unilaterally. Never in the history of the United Nations, a secretary general’s choice of selection has been rejected on the floor of the house.

Should the UN persist with its one-man show when it comes to the selection of key personnel. At a time when there is a cry for greater transparency and democratisation in decision making, the UN has a duty to lead by example. It is therefore all the more desirable that it should jettison its hidebound process of selection and recruitment and embrace a more democratic style that befits its reputation and credentials.


Source : IIPM Editorial, 2013.
An Initiative of IIPM, Malay Chaudhuri
For More IIPM Info, Visit below mentioned IIPM articles
IIPM’s Management Consulting Arm-Planman Consulting
Professor Arindam Chaudhuri – A Man For The Society….
IIPM: Indian Institute of Planning and Management
IIPM makes business education truly global
Management Guru Arindam Chaudhuri
Rajita Chaudhuri-The New Age Woman

ExecutiveMBA

Thursday, June 06, 2013

Lessons not learnt

A 2010 high-level army assessment had predicted Chinese designs on Daulet Beg Oldi but India’s civilian rulers could not care less. Mayank Singh has the details.

The country may have woken up to the surprising and unexpected news of China entering and tenting in Depsang area, 30 kilometers south of Daulet Beg Oldi, in the Ladakh district of Jammu and Kashmir. But not the Indian Army.

According to a high-level Indian Army report submitted in 2010, this latest transgression by the Chinese army was pretty much on the cards. The report which was prepared under the command of a Lieutenant General was, “intended to be a guidance document for commanders and staff in evolving, reviewing and refining of operational plans with full knowledge and appreciation of the overall strategic context under which Sino-Indian military confrontation may occur and with deep insight into PLA’s military doctrinal content, its military capability, availability and types of forces for application in each sector and forms in which the threat may manifest.”

The high-level report had noted - quite correctly as it turned out on April 15 - that the Chinese strategy is not to grab territory but to send a message and to make political gains. It had predicted that China will avoid the Chusul sector but will try grabbing territory on the Daulet Beg Oldi side

The report speaks of the rise of both India and China but warns against lowering our guards. “While seeking and expecting a benign Sino-Indian cooperative and collaborative Asian geopolitical order, it would be imprudent to ignore China’s politico-military capabilities, its Asian and global ambitions and its track record, mindset and strategic culture. There is no alternative other than to intimately monitor PLA’s military capabilities and striving to institute appropriate deterrent military responses, operational concepts, operational  plans and force postures.’’

The report says that China has a proven record of single-minded pursuit of long term goals and objectives which will lead to an environment of conflict of interests with India. Like in the late 1950s and early 1960s before it culminated in a full-fledged border war, the tactics as far as the Chinese is concerned are tried and tested. Whether by accident or design, Chinese troops are more than ever before, crossing into Indian territory. The Chinese deny the charges and whenever solid evidence is presented, they attribute it to “The inexperience of the post commanders.’’

The military establishment is letting it be known that the latest tactical transgression is aimed at showing to the world that India – which has the third largest standing army in the world – can capitulate because of its own lack of foresight and proper appreciation of security situation in a strategic and sensitive arena.

But the critical question is this: if we continue to ignore threat perceptions issued by the army under the guise of misplaced liberalism, then what happens to the intelligence which is being laid out on a platter? The Chinese are not known for making halfhearted efforts and their focused work in Tibet has significantly added to the threat perception and war waging capabilities against India. In Tibet, China has added 20,000 km of railway tracks over the last two decades, compared to a measly 860 km by India in the same period. Here again, it is question of overlooking sensitive developments. While the Border Roads Organisation (BRO) continues to bicker over its inability to carry loads at high altitude because they do not have helicopters, a decision on it has been conveniently kept on the back burner.

Ever alert to the Chinese threat, the high committee report has systematically collated and presented relevant facts and assessments on aspects which would govern China’s geopolitical and military behaviour in the immediate foreseeable future, especially with regards to India. According to the army, the report is an appreciation of the ground situation and an attempt to put things in perspective – the developments in Ladakh have proved to be uncannily precise.

The report says that in the backdrop of key tenets of PLA’s military doctrine of Active Defence, War Zone Campaign (WZC) and recently-evolved Unrestricted Warfare - keeping in view its sectoral military aims - describes and analyses three plausible operation level scenarios which may emerge in a timeline of 2012-17. The scenarios are analysed for costs-risks-gains to China as well their military and geopolitical impact.

Critical to the Chinese plans is their War Zone Campaign (WZC) Doctrine. According to the report, the Peoples’ Liberation Army (PLA) has formulated military doctrine for fighting war at the operational level which it refers to a war zone. The strategic doctrine dictates that military campaign in a war zone is a series of related battles fought under a unified command to seek political capitulation of the adversary.

The report says that it involves a phased rapid yet calibrated rising of conflict threshold and force application while offering an opportunity to the adversary to capitulate and seek negotiations prior to transcending to next phase in the escalatory ladder. Military destruction and annihilation is only a means; political capitulation of the adversary remains the main objective.

The success of this doctrine is based upon preliminary lulling of the adversary into state of complacency while the PLA upgrades its readiness levels. This preliminary phase, to be executed during peace time and over prolonged periods is referred as “External Calm & Internal Intensity (ECII)”. Once PLA’s desired readiness levels are achieved and geopolitical situation is considered appropriate, the actual military campaign under a unified HQ (WZC HQ) would commence under the WZC Doctrine under three phases.

Phase 1 includes actions by ‘Elite Forces and Sharp Arms (EFSA)’ or Jingbing Liqi. In this phase, special operation forces (SOF) are deployed to gain first hand information of the battle, disrupt the enemy’s build up and make a political statement asking the adversary to back off. The aim is political victory, not territorial gain. If the adversary backs off, the WZC is considered successful.

In Phase 2, if the adversary does not capitulate through EFSA measures, the next phase is to ‘Gain Initiative by Striking First' (GISF) or Xianji Zhidi. The purpose is to prosecute ‘deep non-contact battle’ through long range precision strikes at adversary’s strategic locations and major military infrastructures. These are to be conducted in synergy with intense cyber war and other elements of asymmetric threats. The main objective is to cause decision paralysis and convince the enemy of the inevitability of military annihilation unless they capitulate and seek negotiations. This is often referred to as `winning victory with one strike.’


Source : IIPM Editorial, 2013.
An Initiative of IIPM, Malay Chaudhuri
For More IIPM Info, Visit below mentioned IIPM articles
2012 : DNA National B-School Survey 2012
Ranked 1st in International Exposure (ahead of all the IIMs)
Ranked 6th Overall

Zee Business Best B-School Survey 2012
Prof. Arindam Chaudhuri’s Session at IMA Indore
IIPM IN FINANCIAL TIMES, UK. FEATURE OF THE WEEK
IIPM strong hold on Placement : 10000 Students Placed in last 5 year
BBA Management Education

Tuesday, June 04, 2013

Back to square one

Will Musharraf's return change Pak's political scenario?

"Where are the people who said I will never return home. I have been receiving death threats and some people have been trying to scare me but I have returned home for the sake of my country and people," was Pervez Musharraf’s riposte to the skeptics who discounted his chance of return owning to the charges hanging against him. It is noteworthy that Musharraf's safe homecoming was tolerated by Asif Ali Zardari, the man who was put behind bars and later forced into exile by Musharraf himself as Pakistan’s president way back in 1999 and 2004 respectively. It is debatable whether it’s a gesture of magnanimity or a lame submission to General Kayani’s dictate, with whom Musharraf enjoys an arm’s length relationship. Despite being one of the weakest presidents of Pakistan, Zardari knows that Musharraf doesn’t present a realistic challenge for him in the upcoming general election to be held in May this year. Not because Musharraf doesn’t hold any charisma but he is endowed with too little time to establish a foothold in the heartland of Pakistan. Further, and most importantly, Zardari was helpless as a multi-participant’s deal was struck involving the army, the government of Saudi Arabia, Nawaz Sharif and Musharraf.

Musharraf’s impact on the impending polls and in Pakistan’s public life doesn’t seem too potent as the contest will be a tripartite dead-heat race among Zardari, Imran Khan and Sharif. However, the Muttahida Qaumi Movement, the leadership of Indian immigrants in Pakistan, has immediately warmed up to Musharraf with open arms much to his delight in an otherwise hostile environment prevailing.

Musharraf had been a mixed bag for India – on the one hand he orchestrated the Kargil war as military general while on the other he had been instrumental in cooling Kashmir’s simmering pot as the country’s president.


Source : IIPM Editorial, 2013.
An Initiative of IIPM, Malay Chaudhuri
For More IIPM Info, Visit below mentioned IIPM articles

Monday, June 03, 2013

A 20,000 tonne dilemma

It is important to increase the supply of gold to the market and reduce import levels. 

The government has recently announced an increase in the import duty on gold with a view to strengthen the external sector of the economy and shore up the value of the Indian currency. While the duty on refined gold used for jewelry has been hiked from four to six percent, that on gold dore used for industrial requirements, particularly in the refinery sector, has been raised from two to five percent. The government has taken this decision because our economy suffers from the highest current account deficit at 5.4 percent of GDP.

The problem with this policy is that it focuses solely on the demand rather than supply side economics. To that extent, such a policy change is unlikely to lower the demand for gold across the country, owing to the people’s psyche and ills of economic governance.

The traditional role of gold in Indian society is embedded as a culture of savings to meet family requirements like weddings or religious ceremonies. Besides, trading communities traditionally tend to invest in gold as a form of contingency fund to bail them out in case of potential business losses in the future. Also Hindu temples like Tirupati and Padmanabaswamy in Tiruvanthapuram are known to hold huge gold reserves. Similarly, other religious bodies also possess gold reserves. All this in a sense, suggests the centrality of gold to Indian life. Gold remains a primary investment across all socio-economic segments because of tradition, security and hedge against inflation drive demand. Acquisition of gold at this juncture, characterized by an uncertain economy, offers the investor capital appreciation unlike any other form of investment. Therefore, an enhanced demand for gold occurs when investments in real estate, stocks and shares, debt securities, besides mutual funds are unable to offset high inflation rates. Thus, gold continues to remain the most attractive form of investment.

The government’s inability to effectively curb the high inflation rate, besides other problems like low growth rate, unhealthy level of deficit finance and an alarming current account deficit has shattered people’s credibility in economic governance. Also the fact that internationally renowned credit rating agencies are contemplating to further lower the country’s investment grade, only reinforces such a line of thinking.

The country consumes 800-1000 tonnes of gold annually, which amounts to $38 billion or 20 percent of the global demand. The new measure is expected to decrease demand for gold by 10 percent. India imports gold worth over $35 billion largely from South Africa and the US for domestic consumption. Today, gold comprises 10-15 percent of India’s imports. This policy aims to reduce the widening trade and current account deficit to eventually strengthen the rupee. Today, the external value of the Indian rupee has declined in relation to the dollar, which is also India’s trading currency.

Whether adoption of such a policy would address the problem or not is improbable as this approach only tackles the symptom but not the cause. It is important to note that the price of gold in India, even before the proposed hike in import duty was seven percent higher than the international price. This proves that when demand gallops ahead of supply, higher prices are bound to prevail. Gold has a low elasticity to price and therefore, higher duties have less effect on consumption and imports.

The number of artisans employed in the gold jewelry industry across the country is estimated to be nearly two million people. If  gold’s demand drops by 10 percent, there will be a direct bearing on the unemployment levels, which in turn has the potential to create social problems like crime and suicide.


Source : IIPM Editorial, 2013.
An Initiative of IIPM, Malay Chaudhuri
For More IIPM Info, Visit below mentioned IIPM articles
2012 : DNA National B-School Survey 2012
Ranked 1st in International Exposure (ahead of all the IIMs)
Ranked 6th Overall

Zee Business Best B-School Survey 2012
Prof. Arindam Chaudhuri’s Session at IMA Indore
IIPM IN FINANCIAL TIMES, UK. FEATURE OF THE WEEK
IIPM strong hold on Placement : 10000 Students Placed in last 5 year
BBA Management Education

Saturday, June 01, 2013

Movie Review: I, Me Aur Main

Oh boy, what a pain!

I am the best, the protagonist of I, Me Aur Main, intones every time he is assailed by self-doubt. He does this standing before a mirror, his fists clenched like a pugilist poised to deliver the knockout punch. You expect the guy to be a man of action. Turns out he’s not. The punch never materializes. And a KO is out of the question.

When neither the plot premise nor the treatment has anything to write home about, expecting John Abraham to come up with a deadly coup de grace on behalf of this middling romantic comedy is really the height of optimism.

As the title suggests, this is about a man who cannot see beyond his nose. But he is a lucky bloke – he gets away with being a pain in the neck.

Neither this guy nor his story is particularly interesting. The narrative is crammed with predictable devices, and the women in the protagonist’s life do not seem to possess a life of their own.

Which woman worth her salt would fight to cling on to a man who lives with her for three years, refuses to pay the milkman’s bill because he drinks black coffee, and dithers endlessly when it comes to the question of solemnizing the relationship?
About the only surprise the film springs is that it does not end in a gaudy shaadi shamiana swarming with smarmy guests belting out a raucous celebratory song. Instead, the climax unfolds in a maternity ward where a baby girl is born and all is forgiven.

Directed by debutant Kapil Sharma, I, Me Aur Main revolves around a music producer (John Abraham) out of tune with the times. His live-in partner (Chitrangda Singh) tries in vain to make him take her home to mom (Zarina Wahab). When all efforts fail, she dumps him. The hero finds another woman, a fashion stylist (Prachi Desai), who is the exact opposite – bubbly and full of beans. And life goes on…

The film never springs to life, twisting through a sub-plot about the hero’s boss (Raima Sen) who, in her own words, has been hired by the music company to put him in his place. The male protagonist decides to get his own back by launching a new singer who has been rejected by the boss. He gets too many shots at redemption – by the time he gets it right, the audience has ceased to care.


Source : IIPM Editorial, 2013.
An Initiative of IIPM, Malay Chaudhuri
For More IIPM Info, Visit below mentioned IIPM articles

Friday, May 31, 2013

More research same results

Everybody knows which is the rape capital of India; a survey nails it again

The brutal gang-rape of a girl in Delhi in December 2012 again justified Delhi's title ignominious title as ‘the rape capital of India.’ The growing number of crimes against women has proved the city’s inability to provide safety to this vulnerable section of society.

According to a recent TripAdvisor survey, "Delhi is voted to be the most unsafe city while Mumbai is ranked as the safest city." Bangalore and Ahmedabad are rated as second most safe cities of India. Around 94 per cent foreign female respondents expressed their fear of visiting India alone, but not when they travel to other international destinations. This fear can be gauged by browsing the records of National Crime Records Bureau. According to NCRB, 24,206 incidents of rape and molestation were recorded in India in 2012, which is a rise of 9 per cent over the last year. Delhi alone recorded over 4,000 rape cases in 2011. More than half of the reported cases had victims between the age group of 18 and 30. A 2009 government crime report said that about 24 percent of total rape cases and above 40 per cent of cases of kidnapping and abduction of women took place in Delhi. In another survey jointly conducted by a women's rights group Jagori and the UN, it waas revealed that two of every three women in Delhi have been sexually harassed at least twice and at the maximum five times in the last one year. Shockingly, 40 per cent of harassment and molestation incidents took place in broad daylight. What is worse, 45 per cent women surveyed felt no cooperation from the police if they approached. Unfortunately, 70 per cent of men interviewed said that they would not intervene and rather be mute spectators.

Delhi Police has earned the reputation of being untrustworthy by local civilians. They have failed to set the environment of 'zero tolerance’ against rape. The conviction rates too are in a complete mess with below average forensic capabilities and very hollow anti-rape laws, despite the recent changes.


Source : IIPM Editorial, 2013.
An Initiative of IIPM, Malay Chaudhuri
For More IIPM Info, Visit below mentioned IIPM articles

Thursday, May 30, 2013

Much ado about nothing

By trivialising and politicising the War Crime Trial, the Awami League regime blew the historic opportunity to punish the 1971 War Criminals through an internationally accepted procedure, says Saurabh Kumar Shahi

After the sentencing of a senior Jamaat e Islami (JI) leader to life in prison last week for crimes against humanity during the 1971 war, Bangladesh is witnessing probably the biggest political turmoil since the 80s and 90s. Abdul Quader Molla, one of the top rung leaders of the JI, is the first political figure to be sentenced by the International Crimes Tribunal, following the verdict against a runaway televangelist who was awarded death penalty in absentia.

The verdict was followed by protests by the mass of urban liberal Bangladeshis who gathered at the Shahbagh More locality demanding more stringent punishment for the war criminals. The latter only intensified their protest after one of the bloggers and organisers of the protest was brutally killed outside his home. On the other hand, sensing the government's mood of altogether banning them, strengthened by the adoption of the required amendment by the parliament, the JI and its student union has stated a nationwide protest that will make or break its future.

The issue of war crimes is a complex one and it was but natural that the trials would evoke dramatically opposite reactions. However, the way the process has been politicised has taken the lustre out of it.

It can be historically substantiated that JI and its Razakars helped the Pakistani army suppress the revolt in 1971, leading to horrendous crimes. It can also be proved without a reasonable doubt that many of its leaders were aligning against the popular national mood. However, the regime in power as well as other supporters of the trial have singularly failed to parade enough eye witnesses to testify against them. Also, the tribunal will have to ascertain whether these Razakars and JI leaders committed crimes against humanity by organising genocides of the unarmed population or merely targeting armed Bengali freedom fighters.  

Sheikh Hasina's Awami League came to power last time promising a tribunal that would try the war criminals of 1971. However, following her accent, she kept dithering before it became impossible for her, because of persistent pressure from civil rights groups, to further delay the tribunal. Hasina understands that if the tribunal completes its duty and gets international recognition, it will effectively rob her of her most dependable election plank. The fact that her party came to power several times following independence and yet failed to try the war criminals, speaks volume about her commitment.
Naturally, her government flouted several norms while constituting the tribunal, attracting damning criticism from world bodies. The United Nations through its Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions, Christof Heyns, expressed dismay at the trial and maintained: “Capital punishment may be imposed only following proceedings that give all possible safeguards to ensure a fair trial and due process, at least equal to those stipulated in the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, to which Bangladesh is a State party.”

Says, Mohammad Nakibur Rahman, a Bangladesh expert based with Tulane University, “Indeed The Economist recently uncovered collusion between the government-prosecution side of the trial and the judiciary. In addition, the unrelenting media campaign has meant that Shahbag protesters have made up their minds regarding the guilt of those in the dock, regardless of the evidence of a doctored trial.”

Others including the US Ambassador-at-Large for War Crimes, Stephen J Rapp, and Human Rights Watch expressed concerned over  “glaring violations of fair trial standards”.  The criticism has not only emboldened the accused, all of whom are members of either JI or the opposition Bangladesh National Party (BNP); but has also given them an excuse to say that they were victims of a political vendetta.

Even longtime supporters of the cause, for example journalist David Bergman, have criticised the entire process. “The government has unjustifiably prevented their international lawyers from coming to Bangladesh and assisting them in the court room. Also, even though the substantive matters of guilt and innocence are currently before for the tribunal, some of the most influential printed media continue to talk about the men as though they were guilty and their convictions a foregone conclusion. Moreover, on the other side of the coin, the possibilities of journalists here in Bangladesh being able to write critical commentary about the tribunal are decreasing. The attacks on Al Jazeera and myself are tantamount to that,” he maintained.

Experts also believe that Hasina's gambit might not find traction in the coming elections. Banning JI, although desirable, will only send the signal to the poor rural masses – where JI has its hold – that only family run parties like AL and BNP have a place in the democracy. Also, even if the party is banned, its members can always constitute a new party or merge with BNP.


Source : IIPM Editorial, 2013.
An Initiative of IIPM, Malay Chaudhuri
For More IIPM Info, Visit below mentioned IIPM articles

Wednesday, May 29, 2013

Book Review : On Warne

Of googlies and flippers

His wasn’t a mere cricket career. It was a full-fledged saga, a non-stop media event, as exasperating as it was exhilarating. Shane Keith Warne has been the subject of many books already – at least 15 at last count. His spectacular achievements as a leg-spinner and spate of misdemeanours as a trouble-prone celebrity are well documented. Yet the two dramatic decades that he spent peddling his incredible wares on the world stage were far too heavily laden with both triumphs and controversies to be fully deconstructed in a single tome.

Veteran journalist Gideon Haigh gives it another shot and makes a fair fist of it. Looking at the life and times of the greatest spinner, if not bowler, of all times through a set of different prisms, On Warne comes up with a well-rounded portrait of a natural born champ who made the headlines around the cricketing world with his exploits both on the field and off it.

Based on interviews with Warne and his mentors and teammates conducted over the years and his own recollections of the bowler in action, Haigh provides perhaps the most illuminating account yet of a man bedevilled by contradictions and still completely taken up by the magic of his craft.

The web that Warne spun around batsmen sprang from simple methods. But the results they achieved were anything but. As he has claimed, cricket found him, and not the other way around. “He was taken in by the game,” Haigh writes, “as he floated through it because of a unique set of circumstances; and that embrace was an outcome not of success but of compound failure, in sport in general, and cricket in particular.”
     
From the making of the legend to the many follies of a life lived under constant scrutiny, replete with brushes with women, diet pills, career-threatening injuries, run-ins with Australian cricket bosses and even a bookmaker, the book tracks the entire Shane Warne story without pulling any punches. The result is a dossier that is as riveting as the master leggie’s magnificent accomplishments.

Warne’s career witnessed many highs and lows, but the unalloyed joy that he brought to the complex art of leg spin bowling remains unparalleled. He was a feared opponent, and not merely for the bag of tricks that he had up his sleeves, but also for the sheer swagger, born from a sense of superiority, that he brought to the contest.

“The essence of spin bowling is to tease and to goad, to incite batsmen to misjudge, overstep, overreach. Warne took it just a little further,” the author writes in the section ‘The Art of Warne’. “He presented the opponent with a narrative. I am better than you, he said; everybody knows this, but circumstances decree we go through the motions of proving the obvious.”

But there was nothing that was obvious in what Sri Lankan batsman Aravinda de Silva called Warne’s “honeytrap”. Haigh refers to Peter Roebuck once likening “young Australians playing English spin in the 1980s to schoolchildren accustomed to calculations suddenly being bombarded with mental arithmetic”. The author stretches that: “English batsmen trying to puzzle Warne out in the 1990s looked like children tackling calculus using their fingers.”

Haigh identifies four distinct stages in Warne’s evolution as a leg-spinner. In the time of Warne 1.0, the bowler “did not so much seem to get batsmen out as defeat them entirely”. He thrived on the novelty factor. This, Haigh writes, “was the ‘leg spin’ about which our elders told us these many years, and damn if it wasn’t just as perplexing as they’d always said”.

While there can be no end to fascinating analysis of the sheer impact of Warne’s bowling on befuddled batsmen, perhaps the most readable part of this book pertains to his relationship with four other ‘pivotal personalities of his era’ McGrath, MacGill,  Waugh and Buchanan”.

Haigh devotes several pages to Warne’s fruitful partnership with McGrath. “For a decade, they were something like an incantation. Other countries had great elisions: Ambrozanwalsh, Donaldanpollock, Wasimanwaqar. But Warnanmagrah were the great conversation stopper. You looked up and down Australia and its opponent on any given day, and there often seemed not much to choose between them on paper. Then you came to Warnanmagrah. They played for Australia, and they were matchless.”


Source : IIPM Editorial, 2013.
An Initiative of IIPM, Malay Chaudhuri
For More IIPM Info, Visit below mentioned IIPM articles
2012 : DNA National B-School Survey 2012
Ranked 1st in International Exposure (ahead of all the IIMs)
Ranked 6th Overall

Zee Business Best B-School Survey 2012
Prof. Arindam Chaudhuri’s Session at IMA Indore
IIPM IN FINANCIAL TIMES, UK. FEATURE OF THE WEEK
IIPM strong hold on Placement : 10000 Students Placed in last 5 year
BBA Management Education

Tuesday, May 28, 2013

'More cities should play in the league'

How much is HIL going to benefit Indian hockey in the long run?
It is one of the best things to have happened for Indian hockey. Never before have so many Indian players got the opportunity to play in so many matches for so long. So it is not only benefiting Indian hockey, it is also helping the players. I have seen all the matches. Almost all the matches were of high intensity and high voltage. So I feel it will boost the morale of the players, especially the youngsters.

Can you name youngsters who are doing well in HIL?

Though he is already playing for India, I am really impressed with the performance of Akash Deep. Among the older players, Gurbaj Singh and SV Sunil are playing well. I think there is a good mixture of young and older players in this league.

How do you assess the response of the fans?

The fans are coming to watch the matches. They are appreciating the close contests as well. I think this is just a beginning. In the future there will be huge change in the standard of this league. And that will provide a boost to the potential of the players as well.

Will the improvement impact India's showing in international tournaments?

As I have already said, we can see the change happening because Indian players have never played for such a long stretch with and against top foreign players like Jamie Dawyer, Moritz Fuertse, etc.
Can you tell us what the speciality of Delhi team is. They have done really well in the league?
For me the USP of the Delhi Waveriders is they gel together very well. Almost all the players, whether they are from India or abroad, are equally good. They are all virtually of the same standard. There shouldn't be a huge gap in the experience of two players. For example, in the Punjab team, a few of the players are not as experienced as Jamie Dawyer is, so how can you expect them to keep pace and perform well?

Would you like to see any changes being introduced in future editions of HIL?

I would like to see more teams based in different cities playing in the league. This would allow more hockey fans to see the matches in their own cities and that will generate more opportunity for the players as well.

Would you like to see WSH players being roped in for HIL?
Yes, there were so many good players in World Series Hockey. There were so many big names who played in WSH. They should be given an opportunity to play in this league as well. Every player nurtures the desire to perform well in his chosen sport and if there are quality players who turned out in WSH, why should they be barred from playing in HIL?


Source : IIPM Editorial, 2013.
An Initiative of IIPM, Malay Chaudhuri
For More IIPM Info, Visit below mentioned IIPM articles

Movie review: Midnight's Children

A tryst with destiny 

Pruning a 600 page book into a 130 page script is a challenging task in itself. Salman Rushdie took upon himself the task of betrothing his darling to the big screen and the results are all “acts of love.”

Deepa Mehta guides the film delicately through a path which initially moves majestically and later descends into a whirlwind of colours, crackers, characters and composites, showing India and her chosen children in a light which retains Rushdie’s elegant prose.

Beginning on the idyllic Dal lake in Kashmir, Saleem Sinai narrates how India and the lives of those like him, who were born on the stroke of midnight, on the eve of India’s independence were entangled and challenged. At the end of the film Saleem’s voice (narrated by Salman Rushdie himself) concedes that even though the promise was grander than the reality, they both survived and whatever they did were all acts of love.

What really draws your attention though is the sheer breadth of everything happening on the screen. Hopping from pre-independent India to post-independence Pakistan to the newly formed Bangladesh and back to India, twisting and turning through marriages, labour pains, childbirths, disownments, adoptions, magic, gritty reality, snakes, baskets, spices, sarees, colonial buildings, slums, politics, power and love; all tied by Rushdie’s steady narration, you will come out of the theatre feeling refreshed and bittersweet.


Source : IIPM Editorial, 2013.
An Initiative of IIPM, Malay Chaudhuri
For More IIPM Info, Visit below mentioned IIPM articles
2012 : DNA National B-School Survey 2012
Ranked 1st in International Exposure (ahead of all the IIMs)
Ranked 6th Overall

Zee Business Best B-School Survey 2012
Prof. Arindam Chaudhuri’s Session at IMA Indore
IIPM IN FINANCIAL TIMES, UK. FEATURE OF THE WEEK
IIPM strong hold on Placement : 10000 Students Placed in last 5 year
BBA Management Education