Thursday, September 19, 2013

Merchant of 'Vanish'

PC Sorcar Jr’s incredible magic tricks - collectively labelled Indrajaal - aren’t mere abracadabra. A deep undercurrent of philosophy props up his shows. The master illusionist spoke to KS Narayanan during a month-long performance tour of Delhi. Photos by Mukunda De

Master illusionist and India's greatest living magician Pradip Chandra Sorcar Jr and his daughter, Maneka, were in the National Capital for an entire month in May for a series of sold out shows staged to celebrate a hundred years of ‘Indrajaal’, the ‘web of magic’ that was initiated by his father, the legendary Praful Chandra Sorcar.

Every single day during the course of the month, the father and daughter duo carried on the family tradition and performed enthralling tricks, such as the famed “Water of India”, that were once an integral part of his father’s repertoire. A running gag during his show, it involves Sorcar Jr  pouring water out of a jug that never empties. In Delhi, the US-educated Maneka, the ninth-generation magician in the family, also successfully tried her hand at the illusion.

As scams tumbled out of the government's cupboard and the scorching heat made life rather difficult for residents of the Capital, the air-conditioned FICCI auditorium, packed with schools children, young magic enthusiasts and the elderly, provided relief as the master  and his daughter performed incredible, eye-popping sleights of hand.

The popularity of the Sorcars can be gauged from the fact that this tour went on for an entire month and even at the end of it, there was no let-up in enthusiasm. Every evening the auditorium buzzed with excitement.
Of course, the Sorcars’ vanishing tricks at their Delhi shows were not as edgy and spectacular as they are usually known to be, but they were impressive nonetheless. They are perhaps most celebrated for their vanishing routines. In the past, Sorcar Jr has made the Taj Mahal in Agra and the Victoria Memorial in Kolkata “disappear”.

He has also cycled blindfolded through rush-hour traffic in London, Munich, Madrid and Tokyo and has escaped from a sealed iron chest in less than a minute after a helicopter dropped it into the China Sea. He can walk on fire and water and turn a beautiful woman into a deadly python in the blink of an eye. Andf those are only a few of the unbelievable things he can pull off.

But many admirers claim that his most astounding act was making a train full of passengers vanish before the eyes of hundreds of witnesses at the Burdwan railway station in West Bengal on 12 July 1992. Sorcar Jr repeated that act with the Indore-Amritsar Express in November 2000.

How did he do it? “I have only one standard answer to that question, after which I add, ‘Don’t tell anyone,’” he laughs, explaining that the entire universe is actually magic. Night becomes day and day becomes night - isn't that magical?.

Pretty much as he does when he performs magic tricks on the stage, Sorcar Jr has a way with words. In an interview to this writer, the master illusionist explained that magic teaches many lessons to all of us. "Magic is the way to realise the truth and it helps people realise not to be prejudiced. It tells us not to believe what we see but explore the logic behind things. So I would say don’t believe what the minister said. But try to get behind the truth of his words," he said, opening the free-wheeling conversation.

Ask the master magician about ‘wizardy’, and one gets to dwell on the depth of science and technology. He says: “Magic is a forerunner to science. What is magic today is science tomorrow. In simple terms, unexplained science is magic. The moment it is explained it becomes pure science.” He goes on to give the example of key inventions that have changed human life in crucial ways like fire, machines, aeroplanes…

Sorcar Jr also says that magic adds philosophical and cultural subtexts to the tricks that he performs. For instance, the Water of India, an urn, is repeatedly tipped over and the water keeps flowing. On this Sorcar Special, the magician refers to the much-quoted verse from Isha Upanishad: Om Puurnnam-Adah Puurnnam-Idam Puurnnaat-Purnnam-Udacyate Puurnnashya Puurnnam-Aadaaya Puurnnam-Eva-Avashissyate/Om Shaantih Shaantih Shaantih. (Though there are many commentaries for the verse, one of them is, ”When this Whole is ‘taken out’ of that Whole, the Whole remains”).

On his plans to build Jaadu Nagri, a whole township and university of magic, Sorcar says it is still under process. Though the magician wanted to build Jaadu Nagri in scenic Darjeeling, the plan fell through due to the political conflict in the hills. Sorcar has now shifted it to Tripura.

“There is a hill there that I want to buy with my own money, money that I have earned from my magic shows. I don’t want the support of the government or of any private player; I don’t want any directives or restrictions. If I stop performing, how will I get the funds that I require in order to realise my dream,” he says, adding that a lot more needs to be done before the township can come up.

Without setting any time-frame for his dream project, Sorcar Jr remarks that his motto is simple and time-honoured: do not to ask what the country has done for you, but what you can  contribute to make it a better place.

Surrounded by four women who are performers in their own right - his wife Jayshree, a Bharatnatyam dancer and magician; and his three daughters, - Maneka, Mumtaz and Moubani, with his elder daughter Maneka becoming the first woman to break the bastion of magic held by men.

Though happy at the successful entry of Maneka into the sphere of magicians, Sorcar Jr points to the competition that he faces from her. “See, after my father’s death, he was my competitor. Now my daughter is my competitor. People keep comparing the two of us. Kids go to Manenka first to get her autograph and then they say, 'Uncle, we are coming to you' too. He adds: “That makes me happy and sad. Maneka is doing well. But then there is also competition.”

So he stresses that it is not just the tricks that he inherited from his father that are important. Equally important is every single ‘performance’. Otherwise, the audience will lose interest and move on, he warns.

Like Maneka, his other two daughters, Mumtaz and Moubani, are also creating magic on celluloid as they appear in lead role in Bangla movies.

However, the master points out that a magician does not mesmerise his audience. “There is a better word in Hinduism - sammohan, enchantment.

As much as the audience enjoys his magic tricks, Sorcar too finds innumerable magicians in his audience. “I enjoy the audience more than they enjoy my magic. All of them enjoy one PC Sorcar. I enjoy so many of them,” he says with a hearty laugh.

An applied psychologist by training, Sorcar explains that the audience is of two kinds - enlightened and innocent. The latter come and touch my feet. “I don’t like it at all.”

Among the enlightened, the master magician says, there are those that are looking for trick, art, magic and science. “I perform for children of all age groups,” he says, adding that a third category of audience is like 'tube lights' as they take time to react to the magic.

There have been times when Sorcar Jr has felt sorry for himself when people take magic for reality. He narrates how when he visited a grieving neighbour who lost his son and expected Sorcar to bring the deceased back to life. “When I explained to him that it was impossible, he abused me. However, he later apologised to me.” This is tragic magic.

Besides looking for inspiration from his father, Sorcar Sr, the magician also explores the tradition of magic like Banmati of South India, Mayong in Assam and ascetics back home in Bengal.


Source : IIPM Editorial, 2013.
An Initiative of IIPM, Malay Chaudhuri
For More IIPM Info, Visit below mentioned IIPM articles
ExecutiveMBA

Thursday, September 12, 2013

Do film festivals help make small films make it big?

Let’s face it. Film Festivals – local or global – have a certain snooty, intellectual, arty-farty, culture-driven aura about them. An image that screams superior, exclusive, unique! The message they seem to convey is, ‘We have nothing to do with the everyday mindless masala that you consume with such unsophisticated ganwar-glee because we are classy and niche, celebrating quality and not dumb-cluck 100-crore popularity! We remain committed to acknowledge and reward cinema that is original, fresh and edgy. Sure we are open to mainstream movies, but only if they push the envelope and infuse their material – beyond the stereotypical clichés – with surprise and delight that conforms to our template.’

This unspoken message emerging from the various Film Festivals across the world gives them a special place in the hearts and minds of the true-blue cognoscenti and offers distinct hope of life beyond the Khans!  It provides an exciting platform for filmmakers with original vision, themes and treatment to showcase their gems to evolved, cinema-literate and sophisticated audiences. These festivals (Cannes, Berlin, Venice, Toronto and London) give big or global recognition, praise and prizes, along with huge media coverage that come with the territory, thus frequently transforming an unknown filmmaker to an overnight celebrity. Hence, everything considered, Film Festivals are both, useful and necessary because they salute quality cinema; cinema with soul that reaches out and touches a universal chord, irrespective of geographical boundaries, linguistic barriers or star-power.  Cinema that celebrates truth at 24 frames per second.

Wonderful, inspirational, food for thought etc say some before offering a kill-joy query:  Do these Film Festivals, incidentally, help in pushing the commercial aspect of these great, sublime, hymned and celebrated masterpieces?  For example, in the just concluded  Cannes 2013, small-time, non-formulaic movies like Ugly, Dabba, Monsoon Shootout and Bombay Talkies were screened. Of course outside the competing films because no Indian film has been found worthy of competing in the last two decades, but that’s another story! So will it help their box office status at home in India?  In other words, does the stamp of a Cannes, Berlin, Venice or Toronto generate more excitement and curiosity for our audiences at home?

 Sociologically, it’s a fascinating issue. On the one hand, appreciation or certification from the firangs remain a cherished achievement in a land where Fair & Lovely rules!  However, when it comes to movies, funnily, it doesn’t wash one bit. The howling mobs don’t give a damn about what the global media said or what prestigious awards they picked up. It has to do with what they think and feel. Veteran filmmaker Shyam Benegal – who knows this syndrome inside out – offers his informed take on this subject. “Let’s get some facts straight. Film Festivals, across the world, are mandated to recognise, promote, publicise, celebrate and award ‘excellence in cinema’, irrespective of star, budget or country compulsions. The bottom line is simple. If the movie has a compelling narrative that excites and provokes in equal measure, that’s enough! In this scheme of things, commercial viability and box office potential don’t really feature, which is why respect and prestige are terms more commonly seen, read and heard at these events than preoccupation with the cash counter. Which is also why, while these films will receive critical acclaim and great reviews, they are unlikely to cause any great BO revolution!’’  Benegal is spot-on. Any number of our National Award Winners, then and now, have done the Festival circuit with great success, but tragically found zero resonance at home!  So, while Anurag Kashyap, Dibakar Banerjee, Zoya Akhtar and Karan Johar along with their films and gang of little known stars had a well-deserved blast at Cannes, duly reported in breathless fashion by an infatuated Indian media to a hungry desi audience, how these films will translate at home remains to be seen. While cynicism or skepticism should indeed not enter this debate, it is also important to be realistic, grounded and not necessarily believe that Nawaz Siddiqui and Irfaan Khan or Anurag Kashyap and Dibakar Banerjee are all set to take World Cinema by storm!

Avid Cinema buff Avinash Behl brings in his spin. Articulates the 40-year-old Delhi-based movie junkie. “These are two separate planets so please don’t connect them.  Historically – with some rare, freaky exceptions – films that rock with the Festival juries and critics rarely do the same with mass audiences and not all the publicity of their rave western/international acclaim can ever influence theatre footfalls. If it was so, wouldn’t our art-house filmmakers, so popular with the Fest circuit, be box-office baadshahs?  Most of these poor bozos, despite the prestige, honour and respect abroad, continue to rot at home, begging for funds to do their next film! The sensibilities are different, especially in a star-struck-Bollywood-crazed and glamour-hungry constituency like ours where the culturally underprivileged rule and the Khans are monarchs of all they survey.  Sure it is better than earlier times, but compared to the rest of the world, we are way behind. Our problem is we are too self-congratulatory and get carried away too easily. The 100 years of Cinema tamasha, too, is a joke because in the world stage we have achieved practically nothing! Even today in year 2013, Cannes went back to the master, Satyajit Ray and his iconic Charulata that was made five decades ago.”


Source : IIPM Editorial, 2013.
An Initiative of IIPM, Malay Chaudhuri
For More IIPM Info, Visit below mentioned IIPM articles
ExecutiveMBA

Saturday, September 07, 2013

On a sick bed

Measures to revive manufacturing are urgently needed

India is lucky to have two able technocrats at the helm of its economic affairs: Prime Minister Manmohan Singh is an Oxford alumnus while Finance Minister P.Chidambaram is a graduate from Harvard. Yet despite their helmsmanship, the economic horizons of the country have remained cloudy for some time now. That is in sharp contrast to the economic recovery being staged in the United States and China's steadfast growth, even though it has moderated of late. India's economic signals, on the other hand, have reasons to raise eyebrows: the latest figures from the Central Statistics Office (CSO) reveal that industrial growth has “slowed to a 20-year-low of 1 per cent in 2012-13” compared to 2.9 per cent in 2011-12. Clearly, the country is paying a heavy price for its overdependence on the service sector and showing neglect to the infrastructure and manufacturing sectors.

India’s premier rating agency Crisil says that the current situation is reminiscent of the crisis year of 1991-92 when industrial output grew by a mere 0.6 per cent whereas manufacturing output contracted by 0.8 per cent.  In addition, high input costs of raw materials and the crimping shortage of power supply seem to have further aggravated the problem. But what stands out starkly and clearly is that the government's apathy towards the infrastructure and manufacturing sectors is the reason for this gloomy scenario. Thankfully, the government seems to have now shaken off its stupor and woken to the reality that the service sector alone cannot be counted on to generate growth and employment.

FICCI President Naina Lal Kidwai said recently that "supply-side bottlenecks due to inadequate infrastructure, inadequacy of fuel supply linkages and delays in project clearances of large manufacturing and infrastructure projects should be the priority areas to be addressed through policy.” The government would do well to pay heed to such advice.


Source : IIPM Editorial, 2013.
An Initiative of IIPM, Malay Chaudhuri
For More IIPM Info, Visit below mentioned IIPM articles
IIPM’s Management Consulting Arm-Planman Consulting
Professor Arindam Chaudhuri – A Man For The Society….
IIPM: Indian Institute of Planning and Management
IIPM makes business education truly global
Management Guru Arindam Chaudhuri
Rajita Chaudhuri-The New Age Woman

ExecutiveMBA

Wednesday, August 28, 2013

Book Review: Land of The Seven Rivers

Geography as history

History can be very dangerous because our interpretations are invariably coloured by our ideological worldview. So let me state right at the outset that the JNU school of historians are not going to like this book. The Land of the Seven Rivers: A Brief History of India’s Geography by Sanjeev Sanyal is an audacious attempt that tries to bust many beliefs held strongly in traditional (read Marxist) interpretations of Indian history. For example, the author tries to argue that the Aryans were not invaders but people who originated in India and that the ancient Rig Veda is coterminous with the Harappan civilization. Believe me, hackles will be raised at this!

In any case, I have failed to understand the animosity and hostility between the JNU school of history and the, for want of a better term, the ‘Internet Hindu’ school of history. At their worst, both reveal closed minds and prejudices winning over curiosity. Frankly, I tend to laugh when exponents of Hindutva fashion Indian history though their blinkered eyes, invoking a great culture and civilization of yore when much of the world was hunting and gathering. I think that is taking jingoism a bit too far. For that matter, I also laugh when the more committed members of the JNU tribe dismiss everything to do with Hinduism or Indian civilization as hogwash. I think that is carrying Marxism a bit too far. The truth, as always, must surely lie somewhere in between these extreme positions. I had always thought that keeping an open mind should be the most important qualification for a social scientist! I mean, if theories held sacred even in pure sciences can be found to be untrue by subsequent flashes of genius and discoveries, why can’t the same be true of social sciences?

Take the case of economics. Till 1929, classical economics had unwavering faith in the ability of markets to produce the best possible outcomes. Advocates of this school of passionately believed that free markets lead to fill employment. Then came the Great Crash of 1929 and the subsequent depression when Capitalism faced a crisis of survival. John Maynard Keynes upended the whole structure of classical economics by arguing that markets can fail and government intervention is necessary when economies stagnate. The Keynes school of thought held away till the Reagan and Thatcher revolution of the 1980s when the markets and the pursuit of self interest once again became the reigning deities. Greed is Good became the new mantra till 2008 when Capitalism once again imploded and free market prophets were once again exposed as charlatans.

Surely something similar must happen with interpretations of Indian history? What Sanyal argues in his book about the amazing continuity of the Indian civilization is something that is accepted even by the less strident votaries of the JNU school. Of course, only the ideological hard balls would suggest that India even in ancient times was a political entity in terms of geographical boundaries and systems of governance. Like now, India then too was probably a cacophony of ideas, languages, ethnic backgrounds and a sense of belonging. And continuity is something which we cannot ignore. For example, Sanyal points out how the ox or the bullock cart has been continually visible in India right from the Harappan times to the 21st century. He also points out how the Gayatri Mantra could well be something many Indians have been chanting unchanged for about 4000 years or so. He spends considerable time trying to make sense of the still prevalent myth about the mighty river Saraswati. Sanyal tentatively concludes his quest for Saraswati by arguing that the nondescript river Ghaggar that runs through Haryana was once the mighty Saraswati till geography changed its destiny, and that of the Indian civilization. Not convinced? Even I am not and would wait for more credible evidence.

But I would definitely keep an open mind. Just as I keep doing even after reading Sanyal’s interpretation of the interaction between Islam and India. I refuse to buy the VHP theory that India and Islam mean a saga of conquests, destruction of temples and humiliation. I also refuse to buy the hard line JNU theory that Islam and India are all about trade and Sufism. I think both happened and it will help if both the extreme Left and extreme Right surrender their positions of denial. So if you are not ideologically blinkered and are curious about ‘The Wonder That is India!’, this book will surely give you some food for thought.


Source : IIPM Editorial, 2013.
An Initiative of IIPM, Malay Chaudhuri
For More IIPM Info, Visit below mentioned IIPM articles
IIPM’s Management Consulting Arm-Planman Consulting
Professor Arindam Chaudhuri – A Man For The Society….
IIPM: Indian Institute of Planning and Management
IIPM makes business education truly global
Management Guru Arindam Chaudhuri
Rajita Chaudhuri-The New Age Woman

ExecutiveMBA

Monday, July 29, 2013

Minority appeasement, again?

The SP government’s decision to withdraw terror charges triggers off a storm in the state, writes Puja Awasthi
The steely hope in Ayesha Qazmi’s voice pierces through a patchy telephone connection. “My burdens will go. It is now just a matter of days”, she exults from her home in the village of Sammopur, Azamgarh in Uttar Pradesh. A more restrained hope surges through the voice of Ghulam Qadir who speaks from Kushar village (Kisthwar, Jammu and Kashmir). “The worst is over. Life will begin to move again”, he says.

Ayesha and Qadir have not met but are linked to each other through the fates of two men. In the former’s case, that man is her husband Tariq Qazmi, a doctor of Unani medicine who is prime accused in the 2007 serial blasts of Gorakhpur which left six injured. For Qadir, it is his son Sajjad-ur-Rehman, who was arrested for being an accomplice in the blasts on a confessional statement by Tariq Qazmi and his alleged co-conspirator Khalid Mujahid, a teacher.

With the UP government’s recent announcement of a recommendation to drop charges against Tariq Qazmi, Sajjad-ur-Rehman’s release has become a logical expectation for he was supposedly implicated by the former. However, the logic of the grey war against terror has seldom been that simple. As Rajeev Yadav, spokesperson of the Rihai Manch, a forum campaigning for the release of innocent youths framed on terror charges, explains: “The announcement is just a ploy to distract the community. The government is playing with emotions. The court is free to dismiss the government’s recommendation even if district officials endorse it. Terrorism is a political issue”.

Even if the court were to accept the government’s appeal, Tariq Qazmi would continue to remain in jail as he is also accused in the court blasts of November 23, 2007 which left 14 dead. The case is currently being tried in Barabanki and given the might of the state’s lawyers it is doubtful that the government will risk a similar announcement in it. That more important sub text has been lost in the cacophony that has followed the government’s announcement.

The government has also announced the dropping of treason charges (brought because they shouted anti-India slogans in a Lucknow court) against five accused from West Bengal – Mohamed Ali Akbar, Mukhtar Hussain, Azizur Rehman, Nasimul Hafiz and Nurul Isman. Once again, the more important fact of them still remaining in jail under the Explosives Act was lost in the criticism that the government was playing with fire. The Samajwadi Party had promised to release all innocents falsely jailed on terror charges in its election manifesto. According to a list compiled by the Rihai Manch, 25 such accused from the state are jailed in the state, 20 have been jailed outside the state while 10 accused from other states are in UP’s prisons.

Last November, the government made its first announcement (not recommendation) in the Rampur CRPF camp attack case and was promptly challenged through a petition filed in the Allahabad High Court. Since the government never actually filed an application, the petition was dismissed. This time a member of the Samajwadi Party is threatening to approach the court in Faizabad even though the government’s stand will become clear only on May 3, the next date for the hearing in the case against Tariq Qazmi.

Yet, a storm of protests is rising. The state BJP unit’s spokesperson Vinay Bahadur Pathak says, “There will be dangerous consequences of this politics of appeasement. If the government has to decide everything, why have courts?” Manish Mahajan, the state president of the Akhil Bharat Hindu Mahasabha says, “By rewarding terrorists, the government is stooping low to ensure its hold on the minority vote”.

Within the state’s Anti Terrorist Squad (ATS) there are other worries. “All the hard work that went into building a case against the terrorists will be lost to political caprice. This will discourage the force and send out a wrong message”, says a high-ranking official.

Tariq Qazmi and Khalid Mujahid were arrested (according to the police version) from the Barabanki railway station with 1.250 kg RDX, six detonators, three cellphones and two SIM cards, a month after the Gorakhpur blast. On their confession, a few days later, Sajjad-ur-Rahman and Akhtar, both from Jammu and Kashmir, were also arrested.

In September of the following year, the Mumbai police made five arrests and declared that it had netted the group responsible for all blasts in the country since 2005, including Gorakhpur, thus punching holes in the claims of the state police.

In 2012, a report submitted to the state government by the one man Nimesh Commission (appointed by the previous Mayawati government in 2008) concluded that the police version of events on December 22, 2007 (the day of Tariq Qazmi and Khalid Mujahid’s arrest) was “suspicious” and suggested action against all those officials and personnel who played an “active role” in the arrests of the two, without actually naming anyone.

In a curious twist, the Samajwadi Party government has denied the existence of the report. As recently as March this year, the state’s home department, responding to a RTI query asking for a copy of the report said that it had never received it, hence the question of sharing it did not arise. Seven weeks later, the state’s home secretary cited the same report while announcing the proposal for Tariq Qazmi’s release.

The perils of this ambiguity are obvious to Zaheer Alam Falahi, uncle of Khalid Mujahid. “While it is good that the government is working on its promise, till it does not officially release the report, the perception that the recommendations were not backed by impartial investigations will grow. This will harm both the party and the community”, he says.

SR Darapuri, the state’s former Inspector General of Police, says that there are larger questions that must be answered. “The blasts were a fact, as were the arrests. The government must investigate who was responsible for both. Were the real culprits let off? Where did the explosives that the police claimed to have recovered from the accused come from?”


Source : IIPM Editorial, 2013.
An Initiative of IIPM, Malay Chaudhuri
For More IIPM Info, Visit below mentioned IIPM articles